Tail Criteria, No-Go Audits, and Ap\'ery-Type Certificate Obstructions for the Irrationality of e+\pi math.NT
The irrationality of e+pi remains open, despite the separate transcendence of e and pi. This paper studies the problem from the viewpoint of finite irrationality certificates and gives a bounded no-go audit for low-complexity Ap\'ery-type proof mechanisms. First, we prove exact equivalences between the hypothesis e+pi in Q and eventual factorial-arithmetic phenomena: a ceiling recurrence, a factorial-Cantor digit condition, and a divisibility criterion. These criteria identify what rationality would force, while showing why tail conditions are not finite obstructions. Second, we formulate an Ap\'ery-type certificate framework based on integer linear forms L_n = A_n(e+pi)+B_n with A_n,B_n in Z, L_n nonzero, and |L_n| tending to zero. A mixed integration-by-parts identity produces such forms from integer polynomials. We then audit several low-complexity constructions, including mixed Pad\'e approximation, crossed separate approximations to e and pi, simple J-fractions, holonomic ansatzes, Rodrigues-type families, and an integer kernel-lattice search. The main contribution is a rigid boundary probe: no-go filters marking a tested zone where analytic smallness is destroyed by denominator clearing, coefficient growth, primitive reduction, or continued-fraction shadows. In the final kernel-lattice audit, 145 raw candidates reduce to 133 primitive records; the best signals are dominated by continued-fraction shadows, while non-CF candidates do not form a degree-continuing family. Thus, within the tested low-complexity families, no non-circular Ap\'ery-type mechanism for e+pi is found.