In this chapter we study the connection of modular forms with -functions.
Basic definitions
Let be a modular form, given by a -expansion .
Definition 6.1 The of is the function of given formally as
Proposition 6.1 If is a cusp form then converges absolutely for all such that . If is not a cusp form then converges absolutely for all with .
Proof. We have seen in Theorem 1.15 and Corollary 1.9 that for some constant , where when is a cusp form and when is not a cusp form. Although those results were stated and proven only for level , they hold true (with essentially the same proofs) for higher levels. Therefore if then
The -functions attached to normalized eigenforms have a very remarkable decomposition, known as . In fact, having this property characterizes normalized eigenforms, as the following result states.
Theorem 6.1 Let be a modular form with -expansion . Then is a normalized eigenform if and only if has an Euler product expansion
Proof. By Proposition 4.5 we need to show that conditions , and of loc.cit. are equivalent to having an Euler product. For a fixed prime , condition says Multiplying by and summing over all we see that is equivalent to or Since we are assuming that we get, by substituting , the equality Conversely, if this equality holds then letting approach we get , and the other implications can also be reversed to show that Equation 6.1 is equivalent to conditions and for the ’s.
The Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic implies that if is any function of prime powers, then Using this fact, it is easy to see that Equation 6.1 and condition are equivalent to the existence of the Euler product, thus finishing the proof.
L-functions of Eisenstein series
Let be a primitive Dirichlet character modulo . One can attach an L-function to via the formula
Proposition 6.2 The L-function of extends to an entire function of on unless , in which case has a simple pole at .
We also have an Euler product:
Proposition 6.3 There is an Euler product decomposition
We have defined the L-function of any modular form. In particular, if and are primitive Dirichlet characters modulo and respectively, then we can consider the L-function .
Example 6.1 Consider the Eisenstein series for the full modular group . In Proposition 4.4 we have seen that is an eigenform for all the Hecke algebra, satisfying . If we normalize using its first coefficient (instead of the zero-th) and call the resulting Eisenstein series , then we have . Therefore
The factorization of the example holds in much more generality. Denote by , where were defined in Theorem 5.2.
Proposition 6.4 The L-function attached to the Eisenstein series has a factorization
The idea that one can extract from this is that the Eisenstein series are quite simple, and their L-functions are not too interesting since they can be understood from the (simpler) L-functions attached to characters. In stark contrast, the L-functions attached to cusp forms have much deeper connections.
Relation to elliptic curves
Let be an elliptic curve. It can be thought of as the set cut out by an equation of the form such that the discriminant of is nonzero. The coefficients of this equation can be reduced modulo any prime and the conductor of is an integer whose prime divisors are precisely the prime divisors of (although in general . One can define an L-function attached to via the following Euler product: where . Here, by we mean the set of points of (the reduction of) over the finite field , where we always include the “point at infinity”.
It turns out that elliptic curves arise from modular forms, thanks to results of Eichler and Shimura.
Theorem 6.3 Let be a normalized eigenform whose Fourier coefficients are all integers. Then there exists an elliptic curve defined over such that .
Proof. Construction of . Consider the differential form , and write . To a point we attach the following complex number Let . Then note that does not depend on : Therefore if denote by the following subset of complex numbers we get a well-defined map One can show that is a lattice, and define to be the elliptic curve corresponding to the complex torus . It is considerably harder to show that is defined over , and that .
We may wonder about a converse to the previous result. That is, given an elliptic curve of conductor , can we find a cusp form of level having the same L-function as that of ? Let us give a name to the elliptic curves satisfying this property.
Definition 6.3 We say that is if there is a newform with . Equivalently, if .
The following theorem, which gives a positive answer to the question we asked, is one of the hallmarks of XX-century number theory. Its proof, spanning hundreds of pages of difficult mathematics, relies on breakthrough work of Andrew Wiles in the nineties, although the full proof needed extra work of Taylor–Wiles and Breuil–Conrad–Diamond–Taylor.
Theorem 6.4 Let be an elliptic curve. Then is modular.
Thanks to the above theorem, the L-function of extends to an entire function, which satisfies a functional equation relating with . In fact, there is no known proof of these two facts that does not need modularity of . Finally, the Birch–Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture is a prediction about the behavior of near . Recall that the set of points of which have coordinates in the rational numbers has a structure of a finitely-generated group (this is the Mordell–Weil theorem).
Conjecture 6.1 Let be an elliptic curve defined over . Let be its L-function. Then
This conjectures is one of the ten “Millennium” problems proposed in 2000 by the Clay Mathematics Institute, and it is worth . Very little is known of it. For instance, one does not yet know how to show the particular case However, thanks to work of B.Gross, D.Zagier and V.Kolyvagin, one has the following result.
Theorem 6.5 Let be a modular elliptic curve.
Suppose that . Then is finite.
Suppose that and . Then has rank one.
That is, BSD holds if we assume a priori that is at most one.
The proof of this is also very difficult and uses crucially the modular form attached to by modularity. This is nowadays no restriction, since by the modularity theorem we know that all elliptic curves over are modular. However, the result of Gross–Zagier and Kolyvagin was proven in the eighties, before modularity was proven (or even thought to be attainable). A crucial ingredient that goes in the proof is to be able to produce, in the case of , a point which has infinite order, as predicted by BSD. It is an open problem to find a point of infinite order in knowing that . This is an example of the recurring phenomenon in mathematics: it is easy to construct objects that are uniquely defined, in what could be thought of as a perverse manifestation of the “axiom of choice”.